Those are all good points. Very effective arguments and go right to the heart of the argument. It isn't so simple. Increased growing seasons, increased rainfall in many areas, agriculture and ecosystem growth in northern latitudes, more ice free regions, Arctic shipping, lower heating costs, increased vegetation growth. Prevention of a d…
Those are all good points. Very effective arguments and go right to the heart of the argument. It isn't so simple. Increased growing seasons, increased rainfall in many areas, agriculture and ecosystem growth in northern latitudes, more ice free regions, Arctic shipping, lower heating costs, increased vegetation growth. Prevention of a disastrous Ice Age. Lower extreme temperatures in Northern regions. And the cost of trying to reduce CO2 needs to be balanced with the many beneficial environmental, social & humanitarian projects that could alternatively be funded with that much capital.
These type of arguments can't be brushed aside so easily as by just saying: "Just another crackpot climate change denier, you will be censored".
I should add that a lot of the people in the Climate Change Alarmism crowd are just the usual grifters and scam artists, that couldn't find buyers for any of their crap but have figured out that if you stick the word "Eco" in front of it or tout some climate change Fear Porn, suddenly the money starts flowing. Just real idiot projects like solar roadways in France, a crazy idea, costs 10X what ordinary home solar costs. Nutty geothermal projects that cost 10-100X what greener alternatives cost, but they get $millions in funding, because "they're eco-friendly". And of course the giant carbon trading, net zero, carbon credit financialization of carbon scams. Lot's and lots of billionaires, Al Gore included, who got rich on that money train for the ultra-rich.
Those are all good points. Very effective arguments and go right to the heart of the argument. It isn't so simple. Increased growing seasons, increased rainfall in many areas, agriculture and ecosystem growth in northern latitudes, more ice free regions, Arctic shipping, lower heating costs, increased vegetation growth. Prevention of a disastrous Ice Age. Lower extreme temperatures in Northern regions. And the cost of trying to reduce CO2 needs to be balanced with the many beneficial environmental, social & humanitarian projects that could alternatively be funded with that much capital.
These type of arguments can't be brushed aside so easily as by just saying: "Just another crackpot climate change denier, you will be censored".
I should add that a lot of the people in the Climate Change Alarmism crowd are just the usual grifters and scam artists, that couldn't find buyers for any of their crap but have figured out that if you stick the word "Eco" in front of it or tout some climate change Fear Porn, suddenly the money starts flowing. Just real idiot projects like solar roadways in France, a crazy idea, costs 10X what ordinary home solar costs. Nutty geothermal projects that cost 10-100X what greener alternatives cost, but they get $millions in funding, because "they're eco-friendly". And of course the giant carbon trading, net zero, carbon credit financialization of carbon scams. Lot's and lots of billionaires, Al Gore included, who got rich on that money train for the ultra-rich.